Wednesday, August 06, 2008

Protestors Say Rope Was Cut


SAN FRANCISCO (KCBS/SFGate/BCN) -- A woman who was hanging off the roof of the Chinese Consulate in San Francisco during a protest Wednesday morning fell about 15 feet when according to protestors the lines to her harness were cut.

The woman was one of a number of protesters associated with the group Students for a Free Tibet, who were protesting the Beijing Olympics as the games approach because of what they call China's brutal human rights record.

Nyendak Wangden, an experienced climber who was wearing a monk's robe and had suspended herself in a “hanging” position for the protest, fell onto a landing area and was transported down a fire truck's ladder on a stretcher around 9 a.m. She is now recovering from a fractured wrist and a finger.

When protestors saw Wangden fall, they shouted that someone had “cut the rope.” According to the San Francisco Chronicle, witnesses reported a "loud shriek and thud," followed by a scream from another protestor who was assisting Wangden on the roof.

Three others who had chained themselves to the front of the building were also detained, police Sgt. Wilfred Williams said.

Police have not confirmed that the rope was cut, but the state department has now taken jurisdiction over the case.

Students for a Free Tibet spokeswoman Yangchen Lhamo said two or three consular officials were on the roof and had been arguing with the climbers just before the woman fell, but Williams said he could not confirm that.

Students for a Free Tibet is the same group that organized a climb on the Golden Gate Bridge in April in which three protesters scaled the bridge's cables and secured a sign to the bridge that read, "One World, One Dream: Free Tibet 08."

Lhamo said today's protest marks the start of many protests nationwide that aim to show China that "people with freedom of speech will do everything to express outreach for the struggle they're facing."

The woman who fell today was not badly hurt and had been willing to take risks for the cause, she said. "We're just glad she did not sustain serious injuries," she said.

Meanwhile, in San Jose, throngs of protestors held a rally outside the Santa Clara County administration building decrying alleged human rights abuses by the Chinese Communist Party.

Posters of battered Falun Gong members hung behind the podium as the protesters asked for help in changing the way the Chinese government treats its citizens.

The protest comes two days before the kickoff of the Olympic games but the event was also held in recognition of a resolution by the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors, who dubbed August "Human Rights for the People of China Month," according to organizers.

Tiananmen Square protester Feng Chongde, Supervisor Pete McHugh and other human rights activists spoke.


OLYMPIC WATCH: Human Rights in China and Beijing 2008

Map: Labor Camps Close to China Olympic Venue (1): Beijing Tuanhe

Nearby Olympic Venue in Beijing City:

Name: National Stadium, a.k.a. Bird’s Nest
Events: Opening and closing ceremonies, track and field, soccer finals

Labor Camp:

Name: Tuanhe “Re-education Through Labor” Camp
Address: 1-Tuan’gui Street, Liu Village, Huangcun Town, Daxing District, Beijing
Phone: +86-(0)10─61299888

Directions

From Beijing International Airport: Total 55.2 km
From Wangfujing (City Center) Subway Station:Total 29.4 km

Map:

Beijing area map, showing the location of Tuanhe Labor Camp and Beijing Olympic Venue- National Stadium

Beijing area map, showing the location of Tuanhe Labor Camp and Beijing Olympic Venue- National Stadium

A. Beijing Capital International Airport: ( 首都国际机场)
B. National Stadium: (鸟巢国家体育场)
C. Tiananmen Square: (天安门广场)
D. Subway station
E. Women Labor Camp: (女子劳教所)
F. Tuanhe Labor Camp: (团河劳教所)

About Tuanhe “Re-education Through Labor” Camp

Description:

Tuanhe Labor Camp has been in use since the 1960s, and is said to hold several thousand prisoners. Tuanhe Dispatch Center is part of the same complex, and all prisoners sent to “re-education through labor” (RTL) facilities in Beijing must first pass through the Tuanhe Dispatch Center before going to other sites. Both men and women are confined in the dispatch center, but in separate facilities. Tuanhe Labor Camp is male only.

Prisoners:

According to Chen Gang, a New Jersey resident and Falun Gong practitioner held in Tuanhe for 18 months, from 2000-2001, the majority of prisoners were Falun Gong adherents.

Prison conditions:

According to former detainees, prisoners are held in unsanitary conditions, with over a dozen individuals sharing a room of 130 square feet in which they eat, work, and perform bodily functions. Former prisoners speak of working over 16 hours a day packaging chopsticks for domestic and international use in unhygienic conditions, as well as being subjected to beatings, severe sleep deprivation, electric baton shocks, and anti-Falun Gong study sessions.

Products:

Chopsticks (primary) and steel brushes.

Falun Gong practitioner Chen Ying, now living in France, wrote the following about her experience producing chopsticks in Tuanhe:

“I was locked up with over a dozen other Falun Gong practitioners in a cell that was about twelve square meters (130 square feet) in size. We did everything in this cell, including working, eating, drinking, and using the toilet; therefore, there were many flies and mosquitoes. If we could not finish the work assigned to us, we were not allowed to clean ourselves.

“We were allowed very little sleep each day, and forced to start working the moment we opened our eyes. My hands had blisters and thick calluses from working long hours to finish the assigned quota of packaging disposable chopsticks. I often worked until midnight. We were not allowed to sleep unless we finished the quota. We were forced to work over 16 hours every day, and everything was done in our cells.

“The sanitation conditions were extremely poor. Even though we were packaging disposable chopsticks and the label said the chopsticks were disinfected at a high temperature, the entire process was unhygienic. We could not wash our hands, and we had to package those chopsticks that had fallen on the floor. In order to seek a huge profit, Tuanhe Prisoner Dispatch Center and Tuanhe Labor Camp disregarded the health of the general public and knowingly committed such wrongdoings. Many restaurants in Beijing are currently using these chopsticks. I heard they are even being exported to other countries.”

Show Tours:

In 2001, a closely managed tour of the Tuanhe Labor Camp was conducted for foreign media, exhibiting sections of the camp containing green fields and animals such as deer. However, former prisoners held in the camp at the time speak of a staged presentation by prison officials for the benefit of reporters. Chen Gang reports that before the tour, roads were repaired, buildings painted, and prisoners were given a list of questions and answers to memorize. The list included questions like, “Were there any beatings?” Answer: “No.” During that period of time, practitioners who had not renounced their beliefs were sent to a remote corner of the camp. When they were returned, they were told that reporters had come for a visit, but that officials did not want them to see the practitioners.

Chen also learned after his release that two practitioners who had arrived at Tuanhe only a day or two before the tour were allowed to meet reporters. They were separated and isolated upon their arrival. When reporters asked them if they practice Falun Gong, they replied, “Yes” and when they asked if they had been beaten, they said “no.” Each situation was crafted to convey a positive impression of the facility, as realistically as possible.

Individual cases:

1. Amnesty International Prisoner of Conscience: Bu Dongwei

Bu Dongwei (image courtesy Amnesty International)

Bu Dongwei (image courtesy Amnesty International)

Bu Dongwei currently serving 2.5 year sentence.

Mr. Bu Dongwei was working for the Asia Foundation, an American aid organization, when he was taken from his home in May 2006 by security agents and sentenced to two and a half years of “re-education through labor” (RTL) because he practices Falun Gong.

According to Amnesty International (AI): “This is not the first time Bu Dongwei has been imprisoned for his beliefs. After petitioning the authorities to review their ban on Falun Gong in 2000, he was sentenced to 10 months RTL…. Amnesty International has been told that during RTL he was deprived of sleep, beaten and forced to sit in a small chair all day - all to make him renounce his beliefs.”

AI considers him a prisoner of conscience and is calling for his immediate and unconditional release, an end to the crackdown against Falun Gong, and abolishment of the RTL system. See: http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?id=ENGASA170522007&lang=e

2. Former prisoner of conscience: Zhao Ming

Zhao Ming

Zhao Ming

Zhao Ming, post-graduate student at Ireland’s Trinity College, held at Tuanhe from July 2000 to March 2002

“When I visited China to appeal on behalf of Falun Gong, I was jailed. In the labor camp…I was forced to stand and squat for long periods of time, repeatedly shocked with electric batons, sleep deprived, made to attend brainwashing classes, and force-fed.

“Ten inmates who were under orders by the police guards in the camp once beat me together, which made my thighs black all over with bruises and made me unable to walk for two weeks after that. Two weeks before I was released, I was shocked with 6 electric batons by 5 policemen while tied up on a bed board.”

3. Message for reporters from former prisoner Chen Gang, a musician currently living in New Jersey.

“The CCP can stage everything. I don’t know if they [reporters] can discover the truth there. If you want to know the facts you have to find a way. Don’t be fooled by the CCP. A few of my friends are still in prison there. They could even be tortured to death by now.

“It’s really hard and dangerous but I hope reporters can discover the crimes behind closed doors.”— July 26, 2008

Chen Gang, Zhao Ming, Chen Ying, and Bu Dongwei’s wife, herself a former prisoner of conscience currently residing in the United States, are available for interviews upon request.

- Excerpt from report “Torture Outside the Olympic Village: A Guide to China’s Labor Camps“, by CIPFG

OLYMPIC WATCH: Human Rights in China and Beijing 2008

China revokes visa of gold medalist, Darfur activist Cheek

Yahoo.com: By Chris Chase

Olympic gold medalist and outspoken Darfur activist Joey Cheek has had his visa revoked by the Chinese embassy, hours before the speedskating champion was set to fly to China. And he wasn't even planning on wearing a mask when he got there.

Chinese officials don't need a reason to revoke anyone's visa but, in their eyes, they had plenty of reasons to snatch Cheek's. He is the founder of Team Darfur, a group of 70 athletes whose goal it is to raise global awareness of the human-rights violations taking part in the Darfur region of Sudan. China's military, economic and diplomatic ties to Sudan have been well-publicized in the lead-up to the Games.

Said Cheek of his ban in a prepared statement:

"I am saddened not to be able to attend the Games. The Olympic Games represent something powerful: that people can come together from around the world and do things that no one thought were possible. However, the denial of my visa is a part of a systemic effort by the Chinese government to coerce and threaten athletes who are speaking out on behalf of the innocent people of Darfur.

Cheek was going to China to support the athletes on Team Darfur -- including soccer player Abby Wambach -- and to promote the cause, one that he has championed for years. After winning gold in the Torino Games, Cheek announced he was donating his $25,000 USOC bonus to Darfur and implored his sponsors to do the same. It seems that Joey Cheek is truly one of the good guys.

And now he's out of China before he even got there. With the Games getting closer (just two days away now), the world seemed ready to forget about all the Chinese issues in order to focus on the Games themselves. Unfortunately, China's actions make that impossible. In a time when we should be wondering who will light the Olympic cauldron, whether Michael Phelps can break an all-time record and how Liu Xiang will react to the pressure of 1.3 billion of his countrymen hanging on his every step, we're instead left to discuss the Chinese government's reluctance to allow any dissension in their country, despite repeated promises that they'd clean up their act when the Olympics came to town.

Photo via Getty Images

OLYMPIC WATCH: Human Rights in China and Beijing 2008

The Great Olympic Swindle: How China Tricked the World on Press Freedom


stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust
Huffington Post: Posted August 6, 2008
With just two days until the torch hits the cauldron in Beijing and the Games begin, the world's eyes are locked on China, watching half in wondrous anticipation of the Olympics and half in pure, unadulterated amazement that the world has actually entrusted China with the Olympics.

Back in 2001, Wang Wei, the head of Beijing's 2008 Olympic bid campaign famously told the International Olympic Committee "We will give the media complete freedom to report when they come to China." The motto of the Beijing bid delegation was "New Beijing, Great Olympics," promising a slow but steady improvement of human rights in China and hinting at democratization. The IOC, a body who historically awards the Games to cities that are not only ready, but cities that also need to develop, practically salivated at the idea of a Beijing Olympics and all that it would represent. As ESPN's Jim Caple wrote in an editorial Tuesday:

The four other finalists for the 2008 Olympics were Paris; Toronto; Osaka, Japan; and Istanbul, Turkey; each is a fine, attractive city, and all are most certainly less controversial than Beijing. We would not see "Free Saskatchewan" protests leading up to Toronto. But that's precisely the point: Whether it was the IOC's intention or not, due to all the surrounding sagas, Beijing has made the Olympics interesting again.

And this couldn't be more true. Beijing has certainly made the Games "interesting." But as the Games draw near, what has been most "interesting" is not China's coming-out party, but how China has reneged on all of its promises for the Summer Games, pulling off a swindle of Olympic proportions.

In just the last week, we have witnessed the sad reality of reporters in the official Beijing Olympics Main Press Center going online to do research for their stories only to discover that numerous sites they relied on had been blocked. The Los Angeles Times reported Tuesday that its own Olympics blog had been blocked by the Chinese government and that hundreds of other sites would be censored, not in the hotels or in Olympic housing, but in the press tents. As of Wednesday, MSN's Taiwan site, the Philadelphia Inquirer, the Huffington Post, and numerous Falun Gong and Free Tibet sites remain blocked not only for the Chinese people, but for the Olympic press as well.

If you cling naively to any hope that the IOC will swoop in like Superman and demand the Chinese keep their pre-Olympic promises, don't hold your breath. The IOC, we learned this week, struck a deal with the Chinese government to allow sensitive non-Olympic-related websites to be blocked during the Games. IOC press chief Kevan Gosper told the press, "I regret that it now appears BOCOG (Beijing Organizing Committee) has announced that there will be limitations on Web site access during Games time. I also now understand that some IOC officials negotiated with the Chinese that some sensitive sites would be blocked on the basis they were not considered Games related." Rather than stand up to China on press freedom during the Olympics, our international Olympic body shamefully cowered and became complicit with the censors.

But that wasn't even the worst incident in the world of press freedom this week.

On Monday, two Japanese reporters covering a grenade attack that killed 16 people at a border patrol station in western China's Xinjiang province were beaten by local Chinese police. One told his network in Japan, "My face was pushed into the ground, my arm was twisted and I was hit two or three times in the face." While the Chinese government apologized Tuesday, the event shows that Chinese officials, on both local and national levels, have been trained to react violently, particularly when it comes to what they consider dangerous press freedom. Perhaps the Japanese reporters should have known better than to cover a terrorist attack in the Olympic host country four days before the Olympics.

China makes no mistake about it. They're not going to let a little thing like the Olympics change their ways. The news story receiving the least attention this week that deserved the most was from China's state news service Xinhua titled "Press freedom shall not go above laws." Xinhua, which is merely a mouthpiece for the government, justifies all crackdowns on subversive websites (like the Philadelphia Inquirer) on the basis that Chinese law outranks freedom of the press. Here is a piece from the story:

Journalistic freedom, at any time, is a relative but not absolute conception. Even for the media in the United States, contempt of court and violation of citizen's privacy are banned by laws....

The openness to media complies with both international conventions and the Chinese laws. Just like other countries, China regulates the Internet according to law.

The Chinese laws forbid anyone to spread illegal information, such as preaching an evil cult like the Falungong, or do anything that harms national interests through the Internet.

It appears China is actually for an unfettered freedom of the press, as long as that freedom doesn't conflict with Chinese law, which expressly limits the freedom of the press.

We have all been duped. The IOC, NBC, reporters working in China, those who love the Olympics, all of us. The Chinese government made essential and unequivocal promises they had no intention of keeping in order to win the right to put on the show that starts Friday. By not demanding a free press during the Games, the rest of the world has conspired with China, allowing it to conduct business as usual, shutting off anything and everything thought to "harm national interests." We have given China the immense power to censor, not just for its own people, but now for ours.

And two weeks from now, after the Games have ended, China will be more powerful than it's ever been.


OLYMPIC WATCH: Human Rights in China and Beijing 2008

Foreign activists launch pre-Olympics protests


BEIJING - Americans unfurled a religious banner in the heart of communist China and other foreign activists protested Wednesday on a range of issues, but authorities handled them with uncharacteristic restraint two days before the Olympics start.

The demonstrations were small - groups of no more than four people - and no arrests were reported.

The soft touch suggests Beijing might be hoping to repair its image abroad, which has taken a hit over hot-button issues like its human rights record and its policies in Tibet and Sudan.

But the rare public protests were quickly condemned by Olympics organizers, who are determined to make sure the communist government's plan for the Beijing Games goes off without a hitch.

"We express our strong opposition," Sun Weide, spokesman for the Beijing Olympics organizing committee, said after four pro-Tibet activists were led away by police after putting up banners on light poles outside the National Stadium.

Also known as the Bird's Nest, the stadium is where the opening ceremony for the games will be held Friday. It was the first protest at a games venue.

"In terms of assembly and demonstrations, China has related laws and regulations," Sun said. "We hope that foreigners will respect the related Chinese laws and regulations."

Those rules - stringent in normal times - have been tightened further for the Olympics. Beijing has said it would allow applications for public protests in three designated areas, but it's not clear if any had been accepted. None of Wednesday's protests were in the designated areas.

The government also has used its visa rules to try to keep out foreigners who might want to protest - former Olympic speedskater and Darfur campaigner Joey Cheek had his visa pulled Wednesday hours before he was to travel to Beijing.

The International Olympic Committee, which has faced criticism for giving the games to China despite its rights record, urged Chinese authorities to respond prudently to protesters.

Organizers should expect people to "use the platform of the Olympic Games to draw attention to their causes," said IOC spokeswoman Emmanuelle Moreau.

"The IOC are confident Beijing city authorities will assess the situation reasonably and act with tact and understanding," she said.

Later Wednesday, three Americans spent almost an hour in Beijing's Tiananmen Square criticizing the government's handling of issues ranging from forced abortions to the banned Falun Gong spiritual movement to pro-democracy demonstrations in 1989.

"It was important for us that there be a clear voice speaking out against the Chinese government's abuse of human rights," the Rev. Patrick Mahoney, director of the Christian Defense Coalition in Washington, told The Associated Press by telephone afterward.

The three erected a banner in front of communist strongman Mao Zedong's mausoleum that said "Christ is King" and knelt and prayed. Brandi Swindell, national director of the activist group Generation Life, put out seven roses in memory of those who died in the military crackdown on the Tiananmen protesters.

They said plainclothes security agents and police officers tried to block the banner with umbrellas and started shoving the group when they tried to walk around the square. The agents eventually pushed them out of the area and made them sit nearby for almost an hour, checking their passports, before letting them go, Mahoney and Swindell said.

Sun said the Tibet demonstrators were "persuaded to leave" by police, and were not detained.

Foreigners who protest Beijing's human rights record or official policy of atheism on Chinese soil would normally face deportation. Chinese who demonstrate would face detention and hours of questioning by police, at least.

Tibet has been an extremely sensitive topic since protests against almost 50 years of Chinese rule turned violent in the region in March, prompting a crackdown by security forces.

Also Wednesday, a documentary about Tibetans voicing opposition to the Olympics was screened for a few journalists at a small hotel near Tiananmen Square.

"If the 2008 Olympic games take place, then they should stand for freedom and peace. As a Tibetan, I have neither freedom nor peace. Therefore I don't want these games," said one unidentified monk who was interviewed for the 25-minute film.

The filmmakers said later that the hotel was shut down by authorities but a woman who answered the telephone at the front desk said she knew nothing about the screening and that business was normal.

At least one athlete promoted a political cause.

Amanda Beard, the Olympic 200-meter breaststroke champion, unveiled a poster of herself naked in support of the anti-fur activist group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. The launch has been planned for a hotel but happened outside the Athlete's Village after Chinese authorities canceled the hotel event.

OLYMPIC WATCH: Human Rights in China and Beijing 2008

Tuesday, August 05, 2008

Going for the gold in Beijing - literally

Forget personal glory, national pride and even human rights. This year's Olympic games are all about money

Web page: When protesters by the thousands hit the streets of London and Paris earlier this year, denouncing China and trying to snuff the Olympic torch, it appeared games were losing their mythic appeal. But with the opening ceremony this Friday, it's back to business as usual for Olympics – with business the operative word.

In March, after anti-Beijing riots in Tibet left dozens dead and sparked a crackdown by the Chinese military, the world appeared ready to turn its back on Beijing. Protests along the Olympic torch relay route put the spotlight on China's occupation of Tibet, its war on Tibetan culture and its dismal human rights record at home and even beyond, as enabler-in-chief for Sudan's genocide in Dafur and arms merchant to Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe. The torch relay fiasco also underlined the International Olympic Committee's failure honour its promise to use the games to leverage greater freedom in China.

Upon winning the right to host the Olympics seven years ago, China pledged to improve its human rights performance. Last week provided evidence, however, of how little China and IOC value that promise. Chinese authorities won't even live up to an explicit pledge to permit unfettered access to the internet for reporters at the Olympic media centre. Separately, a report from Amnesty International outlines how, rather than encourage greater freedom, the Olympics have given China a pretext to strike harder against dissent.

Amnesty cites expansion of the "re-education through labour" programme to "clean up" Beijing ahead of the games, taking dissidents into custody and shipping them out of town to avoid embarrassing disruptions during the Olympics. Amnesty also reports that Shanghai activists have been put on a tighter leash, barred from leaving the city during the Olympic period and warned against talking to foreigners.

In recent years, China's standard reply to challenges over its human rights record has been to assert that its double-digit economic growth improves human rights. In that, China echoes the true Olympic spirit: global business. At the nub, today's Olympics aren't about puffed up athletes or puffed up nationalism as much as they are about the money.

The real gold in the Olympics is reserved for the IOC and its sponsors. The IOC reported income from sponsorships, broadcast rights, ticket sales and licensing of $4.2bn during the 2001-2004 Olympic quadrennium (pdf), the last accounting period for which the IOC published full records, and that's certain to rise in this Olympic cycle. Income for its global sponsorship programme, The Olympic Partners (TOP), alone has increased from $663m to $866m from 12 global corporate marketing rights purchasers. Domestic sponsorships specific to the host country usually exceed the TOP take, and that should be especially true for the 2008 games when the host country is the world's largest and most coveted emerging consumer market.

When the IOC and world leaders like George Bush contended after the protests that politics have no place in the Olympics – a ridiculous notion for an event where participants compete under national flags – they were really saying: don't let moral concerns interfere with big business.

Olympic sponsors – who won't get any free publicity here – are spending an estimated $2bn to be associated with the games, not because they love sports, but because they want to sell computers and hamburgers and fizzy drinks and cars and phones and watches and shoes all over the world, particularly to 1.3bn Chinese. These games are an affirmation from the sponsors that Chinese consumers are sufficiently advanced to buy their products and from the Beijing authorities that their disciples are sufficiently free to indulge themselves with these trinkets every bit as unnecessary as an Olympic pin.

Today's true Olympic moment won't be some pituitary case setting a world record in a sport that's ignored throughout the four years between Olympics, then sweating out a drug test. It will be a Chinese yuppie plunking down two months salary for one of the sponsors' mobile phones.

What we're seeing in Beijing isn't China's coming out party, as some pundits brand it, but a coming in party. The house that Mao Zedong built is entering the big leagues of global consumerism. That this spectacle unfolds under skies as soiled and obscured as the Olympic ideals, in venues as hideous as the Bird's Nest and the Watercube, tempts belief that there's a truly Olympian presence, a five ring version of Mao's picture staring out from the Gate of Heavenly Peace, and like the Great Helmsman, it cannot be pleased with what it is seeing.

OLYMPIC WATCH: Human Rights in China and Beijing 2008

Monday, August 04, 2008

The Reform Fantasy

By JAMES MANN
FROM TODAY'S WALL STREET JOURNAL ASIA
August 5, 2008

For decades, as the Chinese economy has advanced, Western presidents and prime ministers have been putting forward one version or another of the "China fantasy" -- the notion that with advancing prosperity, the world's largest country will move toward political liberalization and democracy. Unfortunately, the events leading up to the Beijing Olympics have represented a cold dose of reality. China's actions over the past year -- its tight controls on dissent, the detentions of dissidents, restrictions on entry into China, crackdowns in Tibet and Xinjiang, the obsession with staging a protest-free Olympics -- have shown that China's authoritarian political system is not opening up.

[The Reform Fantasy]
David G. Klein

On the surface, this may sound like an old story: China's Communist Party leadership didn't tolerate political opposition 10 or 20 years ago, and it still doesn't today. What's new here? Yet the run-up to the Olympics does mark a milestone in China's relations with the rest of the world: China has reached the point where it no longer seeks to mollify or accommodate the international community's expressions of concern about human rights. Instead, China can now repress political dissent while virtually ignoring what the rest of the world may think.

To see the change, consider how the underlying dynamics have shifted over the past 10 years.

Almost exactly a decade ago, Bill Clinton traveled to China, the first visit by an American president since the Tiananmen crackdown of 1989. The trip was of considerable importance to the Chinese leadership, which viewed it, accurately, as a major step in its efforts to show the world it had regained its international standing. Before Mr. Clinton decided to come, and in the weeks leading up to his arrival, the Chinese leadership went out of its way to hold out to the world the prospect of political change. There was a "Beijing spring," a new opening for dissent.

That opening proved to be evanescent; after Mr. Clinton returned home, the regime launched a crackdown and dissidents were jailed. However, in retrospect, what stands out is that back then, the Chinese regime at least felt compelled to give the appearance it was opening up. Now, it does not bother. In the run-up to the Olympics, there has been no Beijing spring, no attempt to show political liberalization -- in fact, quite the opposite.

Perhaps this is because while China has become tougher, international leaders have become considerably less willing to condemn its repression of dissent or to use political leverage in pursuit of human-rights goals. During the 1990s, the United States often bargained for specific political concessions before taking actions that Beijing sought, such as a presidential visit. In the months before Mr. Clinton's trip to Beijing, for example, China was persuaded to release a prominent dissident, Wang Dan, and to announce it would sign the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. (A decade later, China still has not ratified this covenant.)

At the time, opponents of this quid-pro-quo approach argued that the Chinese leadership does not respond to pressure or to condemnation. Rather (so the argument went), if the international community stopped making a public issue of Chinese repression and merely let trade and economic advancement proceed, then China would gradually move towards greater political freedom. "Trade freely with China and time is on our side," said President George W. Bush a few years ago. The spirit of liberty is coming to China "just as, inevitably, the Berlin Wall fell," asserted Mr. Clinton a few years before that. There is an "unstoppable momentum" toward democracy in China, declared Tony Blair.

This was the spirit in which the International Olympic Committee awarded the Olympics to Beijing in 2001. And it is the same thinking that underlies Mr. Bush's agreement to come to the Olympics, and to its opening ceremonies, without trying to use leverage beforehand to seek an easing of the human-rights climate in China.

The problem with the "just-let-China-evolve" approach is that it isn't leading to the political change that was envisioned. Instead of producing political reform or liberalization, the result seems to be a Chinese regime that is more emboldened in forestalling political opposition or dissent.

Some claim that it is unwise for outsiders to criticize or draw attention to China's continuing arrests and detentions, because doing so will lead to a nationalistic backlash inside China. Yet this argument is wrong-headed. Chinese nationalism is a fact of life, and not in itself bad. Chinese nationalism imbued the movement for political liberalization in the 1980s and the Tiananmen protests, not just the anti-American, anti-Japanese and anti-French outbursts of the past few years.

The question is not whether China will be nationalistic, but what sort of nationalism it will have. Will it be an open, tolerant and progressive nationalism, or a repressive nationalism? Right now, China seems to be headed for the latter. The results can be felt not just inside China, but around the world, for example in the Chinese block of United Nations Security Council action against Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe.

It's time for the international community to abandon the China fantasy. Trade, investment and growing prosperity do not automatically lead to political liberalization. China will have its desperately "harmonious" games. But the Olympics should prompt the rest of the world to start thinking about the implications of a China that is not opening up in the way that was hoped.

Mr. Mann is author-in-residence at Johns Hopkins University's Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies. His most recent book is "The China Fantasy" (Viking, 2007). This is the first of a two-part series.

OLYMPIC WATCH: Human Rights in China and Beijing 2008

Sunday, August 03, 2008

Kusumi: Media, Media and Media

One and a half cheers for CNN

Diary Entry by John Kusumi

(0.0) View Ratings | Rate It



Tell A Friend

If I can't say hooray, I can at least say hoo.

::::::::

Broadly speaking, there are at least four weighty groups protesting against the Beijing Olympics of 2008. The Save Darfur Coalition and the Free Tibet campaign are two and hardly need introduction, as mainstream news has already reflected their presence in opposition to the 'Genocide Games.' The remaining two weighty groups would be Falun Gong practitioners, who have rallied this year with banners of the Human Rights Torch Relay, an alternative to the Olympic torch; and, Chinese pro-democracy political dissidents, many found in the Freedom First Olympics Second Coalition. (We could acknowledge even more supportive groups. One coalition member, Dictator Watch, represents the Burmese democracy movement. Monks in Burma have been in the news, due to a crackdown last year and a cyclone this year. Another coalition member, the Montagnard Foundation, represents a Christian minority ethnic group in Vietnam.)

My own work has been with the Falun Gong and the Chinese dissidents, through involvements that have included the China Support Network (CSN), the Freedom First Olympics Second Coalition (FFOSC), and the Human Rights Torch Relay. I have had relatively less interaction with Tibetans and the Save Darfur Coalition, although I am fully in support of them and their excellent causes, as well. I am recognized as both a founder and director of both CSN and FFOSC. I have long stood with "the good guys," the freedom fighters who press for more Chinese reform, human rights, democracy, religious tolerance, and government which is truthful and compassionate.

As it turns out, the Falun Gong and the Chinese dissidents have received less coverage, while campaigners for Darfur and Tibet have received more coverage, in the run up to the 2008 Olympics.

This is a continuation of a cat and mouse game that the U.S. MSM (mainstream media) has played for years. The public knew about Chinese dissidents when the Tiananmen Square disaster happened in China; Pew Research said that 45% of Americans were closely following China's political turmoil. For some time, a popular news story led to a popular cause, and America's TV anchormen followed up, showed Chinese abuses, and Chinese dissidents. That was in the early 1990s. Similarly, the public knew about the start of the Falun Gong crackdown in China. In 1999, that crackdown was covered with genuine concern, much the way that Chinese abuses were earlier covered in the news.

Let's think about the year 1999. In April, Falun Gong practitioners startled the government -- and got news coverage -- by having a protest with perhaps 10,000 people standing silently at the leadership compound in Beijing, known as Zhongnanhai. In July, the government started the crackdown -- again with news coverage. In November, U.S. President Bill Clinton signed the U.S.-China agreement for PNTR (permanent normal trade relations).

"Poof!" -- perhaps the wishful news executives would like a gullible U.S. public to believe that Bill Clinton "solved" China's human rights problem, at one stroke of a pen onto a trade agreement! In other words, the PNTR deal, ostensibly about trade, was apparently about more: censorship. Now, apparently, the news executives would be in the regime's corner, helpfully sweeping all Chinese abuses under the rug. The public has not been told much at all about Chinese abuses, from November of 1999 until March of 2008, when the Tibetan uprising again made the news.

The lights of attention went out. The TV anchormen "disappeared" Chinese dissidents and Falun Gong practitioners from the news. America the anti-communist nation was supposedly getting over it, as though the national security state of the Cold War was a passing fever. Anchormen for ABC, CBS, and NBC all said, cryptically, that "globalization is inevitable." Welcome to the trade state, where we have traded away such things as national security, your job, and/or your freedom. Certainly, news execs traded away concern for human rights. The puppet masters who control the sets and props of national TV studios thereby revealed themselves as the bent, craven, depraved, sociopathic, corrupt cabal that they are. In China, the persecution of Falun Gong escalated and is clearly a domestic genocide. Because news execs were "taking it to the next level," political correctness became genocidal correctness, and now I work on a book manuscript titled, 'Genocidal Correctness,' to document news media, corporate, and American behavior during the Falun Gong holocaust.

The archives of the China Support Network reveal that the human rights problem never went away; it was just the national TV networks that went away. Falun Gong and Chinese dissidents were left to suffer abuse after abuse, unnoticed; and to raise appeal after appeal, banner after banner, action after action in the West, to no avail.

I have previously written "One and a half cheers for Anderson Cooper," and today I am writing "One and a half cheers for CNN."

Why did I say that about Anderson Cooper, a CNN anchorman? Cooper produced a piece on "organ tourism," wherein some people go to Communist China for a transplanted human organ. Because the Chinese execute prisoners, the organ may be harvested from a now-deceased Chinese inmate. Anderson Cooper presented the experience of an organ recipient, an American tourist to China. As far as it goes, Cooper's was a fine report, and that is why I said "one and a half cheers." I suppose that my cheer is fine, as far as it goes. But, suppose that there is another side to that story. Suppose that we tracked the experience on the other side, of the organ donor rather than the recipient. And then, if it is a Falun Gong practitioner, we would face the jolt of knowing that here is a prisoner of conscience, meaning not a criminal but a religious believer, being put to death so that their organs can be sold! "Not a criminal" means someone who never belonged in prison in the first place! This type of crime against humanity has not been seen since Adolph Hitler performed medical experiments on unwitting prisoners who were kept in Nazi Germany.

And furthermore, the Falun Gong movement has evidence that in fact exactly this is happening. A disturbing report was issued by two Canadian investigators, David Kilgour and David Matas. Kilgour was a Member of Parliament and Secretary of State for Asian affairs in Canada. Matas is a very senior human rights attorney in Canada. The practice of harvesting organs from incarcerated Falun Gong practitioners is believed to have taken tens of thousands of lives in recent years. In a recent speech, Clive Ansley (a Canadian human rights attorney who is North American President of the Coalition to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong, or CIPFG) said, "This is the holocaust all over again. The Beijing Olympics is the Berlin Olympics of 1936 all over again."

"Those who do not recognize this parallel are limited to the willfully blind; the morally bankrupt; and the profoundly ignorant." --Well, that would only be the U.S. MSM who are now caught out being willfully blind, morally bankrupt, and profoundly ignorant. (Or, if you prefer my phrase, they are a bent, craven, depraved, sociopathic corrupt cabal.)

At least I could say "one and a half cheers" for Anderson Cooper. Cooper plays it right down the middle. He might be a smart guy. He might be a dumb guy. I still can't tell!

Now, I am here to say "one and a half cheers" for CNN. I watched with interest this weekend as Christiane Amanpour presented her piece on "Buddha's warriors," the freedom fighters of Tibet and also Burma. She spoke with the Dalai Lama, with various monks, and prominently featured two activists. It was good to see Lhadon Tethong, the Executive Director of Students for a Free Tibet, doing her work with coverage. And from the Return March to Tibet, CNN showed Tenzin Tsundue, a prominent activist who is clearly "on our side." For the China Support Network, Tsundue has organized events that commemorate June 4 (the Tiananmen Square massacre) in Dharamsala, India. So, it was great to see "the good guys" getting the light of day placed onto their work.

The only problem about the coverage was the scope. Still nothing about the Falun Gong or the Chinese dissidents with their persecution and push back that challenges Mainland China, domestically. Some things never change. Before and after the report, CNN seems mum about the Falun Gong persecution. (In fairness, I have heard the Lou Dobbs show mention Falun Gong, but only as a bullet point, not as an expose.) These days, we are looking for exposes and long form journalism about the Falun Gong and Chinese dissidents. In fact, I am helping the BBC to produce one such broadcast this week.

For all the world, it looks like U.S. newsrooms have an ideology which is (a.) pro-newsroom, and (b.) anti-Falun Gong. Of course, the United States is now run by Baby Boomers, who could change the national motto to be, "hooray for me, and f*ck you." The following people are in Generation X: Tiananmen Square dissidents, Tenzin Tsundue, and myself.

It's very cool how human rights groups have been putting out "tourist guides" for the reporters who are covering the Beijing Olympics.

For a list of the secret hidden prison labor camps in China, they are now less secret in the CIPFG's Guide to China's Labor Camps, headlined "Torture Outside the Olympic Village." That 22 page PDF file is available at HumanRightsTorch.org.

For a list of actual prisoners who have suffered actual torture, the Falun Dafa Information Center has released "Behind the Olympic Spectacle: A Journalist's Walking Guide to the Persecution of Falun Gong in Beijing." It includes the profiles and contact information for sixteen recent detainees of the Falun Gong. Some are dead, some are alive. That 22 page PDF file is available at FalunInfo.net/topic/150.

Human Rights Watch has released its "Reporters' Guide to Covering the Beijing Olympics." That 23 page PDF file is available at china.hrw.org.

And for our part, we release MP3 files. As the Olympics open, we will release a third rock song from Light Club, the group that has entertained at many China Support Network events. This follows on the heels of two earlier songs, Remember Tiananmen Square and Freedom First (Olympics 2nd). The two earlier songs are available now at www.lightclub.us, and the third song will appear as the Olympics open. The new song is titled Chinese Democracy Defiled, and it contends with Guns'N'Roses in the "Chinese Democracy" space. (GNR has an unreleased album and a song both titled Chinese Democracy. Ours will be released sooner -- theirs seems always to be promised for later.)

My one and a half cheers for CNN is due to the graphic photographs that were included in the report by Christiane Amanpour. In recent years, our cause and indeed all news watchers saw the enormous power of still photographs of abuse. As we remember, the U.S. news media obtained and displayed photos from Abu Ghraib, the prison in Iraq where torture was the subject of the photographs. The publication of those photos "moved the needle." And yet, Falun Gong has been obtaining still photographs of those wounded or killed in that persecution -- stomach turning photos that easily match the Abu Ghraib or the Tibetan photos as for vividly documenting the gruesome results of government malfeasance.

The Tibetan photos are at: http://www.tchrd.org/press/2008/pr20080318c.html

The Falun Gong photos are at: http://www.faluninfo.net/gallery/13

CNN gets one and a half cheer based on their showing the world the Tibetan photos. The Falun Gong ones are just as readily available, as one can see at the URL above. Instead of showing the public the Falun Gong photos, the news media has been sitting on the story while a modern day holocaust has continued for nine years. Why is that? Is it the better to serve their communist masters? Is it the better to prolong others' suffering and extend the neglect of this issue? Is it their attempt to be genocidally correct -- validating the John Kusumi manuscript called Genocidal Correctness? My book has a regrettable narrative about the media, and the U.S. MSM conforms its behavior so my narrative fits like a glove! CNN cannot have more than one and a half cheers unless and until it exposes the Falun Gong persecution.

What does it say about the U.S. news media, where one of the above reports says, "With the exception of one article in the Times of London about a Beijing musician who died in custody in March, there has been little attention in the international media to this aspect of Olympic 'preparation.'" Perhaps the box score tracking upright news outlets with integrity reads, "Britain 1; U.S. 0." (Actually, I know a bit more-- I'm working with the BBC this week, so it's "Britain 2, U.S. 0.")

In light of the fact that the U.S. has zero in the score above, it seems generous that I am saying, "One and a half cheers for CNN." And, there you have it.


The first Generation X presidential candidate, John Kusumi was the 18-year-old for U.S. President in 1984 (Independent / Practical Idealist). He is the founder and Director Emeritus of the China Support Network, formed with fellow Americans in 1989 to respond to the tragedy of China's Tiananmen Square massacre. He is also a leader of the Freedom First, Olympics Second Coalition -- a combination of many groups that are opposed to Beijing's Olympic Games unless China first is free. He is also a columnist, podcaster, public speaker and advisor to leading Chinese dissidents, with material at Kusumi.com.


OLYMPIC WATCH: Human Rights in China and Beijing 2008

Saturday, August 02, 2008

Beijing strikes gold

DailyTimes: VIEW: — Edward Friedman

It is actually in China’s interest to make a deal with the Dalai Lama and begin to heal the rift between Han Chinese and Tibetans. This would not only help defuse the disaffection in Tibet, but would lend real lustre to China’s world leadership

On the eve of the Beijing Olympic Games, many human rights activists and observers continue to hope that the Chinese Communist Party’s embrace of odious regimes such as Burma’s and Sudan’s, and its oppression of Tibetan Buddhists, Uighur Muslims, and Falun Gong spiritualists, will lead democratic heads of state to boycott the Olympics, or athletes and spectators to demonstrate on behalf of the victims. I doubt it. The only demonstrations are likely to be those celebrating China’s massive gold medal count.

No one should underestimate China’s will and capacities, especially when it sets its collective mind on a goal. China is a budding superpower that has amassed the largest foreign exchange reserves in the world. No major government will risk retaliation by insulting the Chinese regime with a boycott or public protest. Indeed, France has already dispatched representatives to Beijing to apologise for supporting the Dalai Lama, and for the protests that took place during the Olympic torch relay in Paris.

From Seoul to Sydney to San Francisco, citizens in democracies were angered at how Chinese visitors bullied into silence powerless Tibetans demanding minimal rights on behalf of their brethren in authoritarian China. But the reality is that the Chinese regime has largely neutralised the international human rights movement. In the wake of the Sichuan earthquake, criticism of China will be even more muted.

In 1997, Denmark, a nation whose people are demonstrably committed to human rights, asked the United Nations Human Rights Commission in Geneva to look into the CCP’s long track record of abuse. China responded by cancelling a Danish trade mission. France got the message, and the French soon stopped promoting human rights resolutions directed at China. The French were then rewarded with a string of lucrative contracts in China.

The United States, however, persisted, and China prevailed upon its allies to vote the US off the UN Human Rights Commission. Although China is the world leader in capital punishment and imprisoned activists, its human rights record is no longer a matter for significant international scrutiny.

Although China touts its aid and investment in Africa as being given without strings, governments that accept it repay China in natural resources and political capital. They eschew official relations with Taiwan. They vote to protect China from human rights investigations. They agree not stand up for the Dalai Lama, Tibetan Buddhism, or Tibetan victims in China. Many African nations ship a large percentage of their GDP to China every year.

Europeans see Chinese money in Africa as undermining international efforts to promote good governance, and they worry that Chinese funds are used to shore up corrupt authoritarian regimes. Certainly, China has plenty of cash, states its demands clearly, and asks few questions, and the combination of such policies and economic clout has won it followers.

But a few bold voices have made themselves heard. South Africa’s Nobel laureate Bishop Desmond Tutu has spoken out forthrightly on behalf of Tibetan rights, and South African trade unionists recently refused to unload Chinese weapons headed to Robert Mugabe’s regime in Zimbabwe. South Korea’s government expressed its distaste for how Chinese visitors assaulted peaceful human rights demonstrators as the Olympic torch passed through that country.

Of course, in response to the global outcry, China has yielded a bit on Tibet, with Chinese officials meeting with representatives of the Dalai Lama. But, as with the March 2008 Tibetan demonstrators, anyone at the Olympics who tries to call attention to the regime’s record of abusing human rights will be dealt with firmly. The government has reinforced its security system, and have put in place a ubiquitous system of surveillance cameras. Visas are being denied to anyone active on behalf of human rights, with the unintended side effect of hurting international business in China.

But China’s priority is not just to perpetuate economic growth. Rather, it is to encourage growth while protecting its power. The regime is set on proving to the world that China, once again a world power, can stage a spectacular performance, and that its voice will be heeded.

The message of the Beijing Olympics, then, is that China’s political system not only manages international affairs adroitly, but that the “Chinese way” should be seen as superior even to democratic systems. The CCP’s relentless efforts will no doubt lead to continued economic growth, ensure political stability, and generate significant worldwide support.

But the regime has missed one key point in its relentless march to a “successful” Olympics. It is actually in China’s interest to make a deal with the Dalai Lama and begin to heal the rift between Han Chinese and Tibetans. This would not only help defuse the disaffection in Tibet, but would lend real lustre to China’s world leadership, and indicate the kind of mature decision-making that marks a true “great power”. —DT-PS

Edward Friedman is a Professor of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin at Madison and the author of numerous books, most recently What if China Doesn’t Democratise? Implications for War and Peace

OLYMPIC WATCH: Human Rights in China and Beijing 2008

China’s Biggest Stories Not at Olympic Venues

By Zoe Ackah
Epoch Times Staff Aug 2, 2008
Share: Facebook icon Facebook

human rights beijing olympics
Human rights in China are deteriorating in the lead-up to the Olympic Games, say rights organizations, as Beijing authorities round up dissidents and members of persecuted groups to hide them from the media throng now descending on Beijing. (Bertrand Guay/AFP/Getty Images)

2008 Olympics & Human Rights

Groups release guides to torture, abuse near Olympic sites

Human rights in China are deteriorating in the lead-up to the Olympic Games, say rights organizations, as Beijing authorities round up dissidents and members of persecuted groups to hide them from the media throng now descending on Beijing. In response, some rights groups have offered up guides to help journalists find those hidden stories.

The Coalition to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong (CIPFG) has released a map of Olympic sites with directions to nearby forced labour camps in Beijing, Qingdao, Shanghai, Tianjin, Qinhuangdao, and Shenyang—cities where Olympic events are to be staged in as little as a week’s time.

“When you discover how close some of these hellholes are to Olympic venues, it's sickening," says Clive Ansley, China Monitor for Lawyers' Rights Watch Canada and North American President of CIPFG.

The guide includes seven maps and photos of the outer façade of each camp. Some resemble shopping malls.

The guide also details products made by inmates who show nothing less than Olympian endurance as they work 16-18 hours a day packaging disposable chopsticks labelled “hygienic” in jam-packed, filthy cells, without the water necessary to wash their hands.

Prisoners in other camps are hard-pressed to appreciate the irony of being denied the right to bathe because of failure to package 5,500 bars of soap in a single day, as the report alleges.

CIPFG’s report, “Torture Outside the Olympic Village: A Guide to China’s Labour Camps,” includes phone numbers for the labour camps as well as for the local “surveillance offices.”

Getting a hold of your local “surveillance office” may be as easy as saying “Falun Gong” or “Free Tibet” near your cell phone, according to Human Rights Watch (HRW). That organization has also published a guide designed to assist journalists travelling to the Games.

HRW insists foreign journalists need not feel lonely: “You should assume that in most public places you are being filmed on closed-circuit television, that your cell phone can send information about where you are, [and] that your email and other communications may be monitored.”

A pragmatic crash course in Orwellian subterfuge, the HRW guide encourages journalists to seek out “ a goldmine of critically important and exciting news stories.”

Both organizations realize that the biggest stories coming out of China this August will have little to do with sports. Twenty-five thousand journalists were promised unprecedented access inside China. Beijing officials are more than aware that this could likely turn a $40 billion dollar publicity campaign for the Communist regime into an unprecedented disgrace.

With that in mind, it is no surprise reports have surfaced of massive arrests of dissidents and Falun Gong practitioners.

The Falun Dafa Information Centre reported that since December 2007, 8,037 practitioners have been arrested. Amnesty International also reports that the Beijing police “have used abusive detention practices such as re-education through labour to ‘clean up’ the city.”

From cyber dissidents to citizens petitioning the government over land seizure, Chinese are being swept into labour camps without so much as a show trial, all to ensure they never come into contact with foreign media.

What the CIPFG guide hits home is how hellish China’s forced labour camps really are. Whistle-blowers that have done things we would view as heroic in the West are literally being worked to death. Thirty miles from the opening ceremonies in Beijing, (which another NGO, Reporters Without Borders, hopes you’ll boycott) there are two massive labour camps a stone’s throw from each other. Both package the aforementioned chopsticks.

At Beijing Municipal Women’s Re-education Through Labour Camp, Jennifer Zeng claims she “was forced to squat motionlessly and continuously under the scorching sun” for up to 15 hours.

“I was beaten, dragged along the floor and shocked with two electric batons until I lost consciousness,” says Zeng. “From February 2001, I was forced to make 100,000 promotional toy rabbits for Nestle where 130 of us worked up to 22 hours a day to fill the order.”

Jennifer was held in the facility along with 1,000 other women, an estimated 80 per cent of whom were Falun Gong practitioners.

According to the Laogai Research Foundation, a U.S.-based research group focussed on China’s labour camp system, there were 1, 045 forced labour camps in the country as of 2006. Included in their report are details of camps holding as many as 40,000 prisoners, one of which was an adapted coal mine.

With a track record like China’s and the volume of such reports surfacing, continuing on with the Olympics this year may seem a dark and horrible farce.

Anyone who acts surprised at whatever madness happens next either lived on the moon for years, or is feigning innocence.
OLYMPIC WATCH: Human Rights in China and Beijing 2008

Edward McMillan-Scott: Olympic athletes compete under the shadow of genocide

Yorshirepost: A few months ago, to explain my campaign for a political boycott of the Olympics, I described China is a "terror state".

I wish the sportsmen well but I want politicians and senior figures to stay away from the opening ceremony next week to protest at China's appalling – and worsening – human rights record, in Tibet, in Darfur and in China itself.

By coincidence I had dinner with Prince Charles that night at the British Embassy, in Brussels, where he confirmed his decision not to attend. When Steven Spielberg pulled out of designing the opening ceremony, my campaign took off. The architect of the "bird's nest" stadium, Ai Weiwei, had already said he would stay away because of China's "appalling" political conditions.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy weighed in by declaring, after the Olympic flame propaganda shambles, that he had not made up his mind. German Chancellor Angela Merkel has refused to attend, as has the Canadian Prime Minister, Stephen Harper.

Many MEPs want a political boycott, as increasing reports of a massive purge of dissidents and religious activists filter out of China. The régime is using terror as never before to control dissent.

In a debate at the European Parliament, every speaker but one condemned China and criticised Sarkozy, who, sadly, announced that day that he would go after all. I suppose that France's nuclear and Airbus contracts must weigh with him.

Even though the current President of the European Council, President Sarkozy, is going, the other two institutions – the European Parliament President, Hans-Gert Poettering and the President of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso – are both overtly boycotting the ceremony, as is Benita Ferrero-Waldner, the foreign affairs commissioner. So, in EU terms, my campaign has been successful.

Any politician still planning to attend next week should first get informed about what happens in the real, hidden China.

This month, I submitted a dossier to the United Nations on torture and religious freedom in China. It details the treatment of just two of the people I had contact with during my last visit to Beijing, in May 2006. All were subsequently arrested, some imprisoned, and three have been tortured.

Mr Cao Dong was a tour guide in Beijing. When I met him he was 42. He was terrified, but he came to a dingy hotel room to tell me about his life in a prison camp in north-east China. There are about 15 such camps in that province alone, each holding thousands of the seven million Chinese undergoing forced labour, or for many, torture. Cao Dong said that one evening, his best friend was taken from their cell. Next, he saw his friend's cadaver in the morgue with holes where body parts had been removed.

Cao Dong was one of hundreds of thousands of one religious group which the UN's torture specialist, Dr Manfred Nowak, believes make up the majority of torture victims. Falun Gong is a harmless and popular Buddha-school set of spiritual exercises. Its popularity is in part the belief by all practitioners I have met that they have been cured of some malady, and that is important in a country without a health service. Practitioners neither smoke nor drink, and many believe that executed practitioners have been the source for the 40-60,000 recent extra organ transplant operations, a profitable monopoly organised by the People's Liberation Army.

By 1999, the Falun Gong movement, founded seven years earlier, had between 70-100 million adherents when the paranoid premier, Jiang Zemin, decided to persecute it.

A Gestapo-like network of "610 Offices" in most towns and cities, named after the June 10, 1999, decree which initiated the scourge, systematically arrests, imprisons and tortures these innocent people, whose watchwords are "truthfulness, compassion, forbearance".

Although there are millions of them they do not have a cuddly, statesmanlike figure such as the Dalai Lama and, because they will not openly demonstrate like the Tibetans and their supporters, they perish and go to their deaths silently.

Earlier this year, the régime announced that it was adopting a lethal injection as the means of capital punishment instead of a bullet through the head – the mouth was propped open to minimise damage, but still a messy way to kill. It is not hard to understand this change. In one province alone, 16 buses have been specially adapted to perform on-the-spot eviscerations.

Another interview I had in Beijing was with Mr Niu Jinping, then 52, another former prisoner. He told me how his wife was being beaten black and blue in the nearby Beijing Women's Labour Camp, and had lost her sight and hearing. He had lost his job, sold his house, and now subsisted on tips for guarding cars; he was destitute and desperate.

At one point, his wife was taken, unconscious, to the prison hospital after a particularly severe beating caused a cerebral haemorrhage.

Zhang Lianying, now 48, was released in December 2007 after she and her husband – both practitioners – were invited to give evidence to a European Parliament hearing on human rights in China. Both were re-arrested in April this year as part of the pre-Olympic crackdown, especially severe in Beijing.

If we had known what was already taking place in Germany's camps in 1936, the Olympics would not have taken place in Berlin. When US Supreme Court judge Felix Frankfurter was told in 1942 about the death camps by the young Pole, Jan Karski, he said: "I did not say the young man was lying. I said that I am unable to believe him. There is a difference."

There is ample evidence that the régime in Beijing is guilty of what amounts to genocide against sections of the population under its control. A boycott of the Games, held under the Olympic banner of "universal fundamental ethical principles", is the least we can expect of our leading politicians.
OLYMPIC WATCH: Human Rights in China and Beijing 2008

Israeli Rabbinical Council Finds Chinese Regime Liable for Falun Gong Deaths

Calls participation in the Olympic Games “an indirect danger to world peace”

CFP: By Online Saturday, August 2, 2008

NEW YORK--In an unprecedented decision, a special Israeli rabbinical council ruled last week that the Chinese regime has been responsible for the killing of Falun Gong practitioners, Sanhedrin

"On the basis of the accumulation of the various testimonies and indirect evidence, the International Court of the Nascent Sanhedrin, came to the conclusion that there were unnumbered cases of killing of innocent Falun Gong practitioners [by agents of the Chinese government], perhaps also out of consideration of material benefits derived from organ harvesting,” said the court in a decision dated July 15, 2008.

“If the human rights issues are not addressed before the Olympic Games begin, we consider participation in them by athletes and by spectators and political leaders to be an indirect danger to world peace,” it further stated.

The ruling was issued in response to a request filed by Israeli Falun Gong practitioners in July 2007. The Sanhedrin, an ancient council of sages re-established by several rabbis in Israel in 2004 as a source of Jewish jurisprudence, comprises 71 scholars of Jewish law and is headed by Rabbi Adin Steinzaltz. Its International Court, a subcommittee addressing international issues, put out the present opinion as a form of religious guidance and on the basis of Jewish law.

The court issued the decision after examining testimony and evidence brought before it by human rights experts, including the U.S.-based Human Rights Law Foundation (HRLF) and David Kilgour, former Canadian Secretary of State for Asia-Pacific and coauthor of an independent investigation entitled “Report into Allegations of Organ Harvesting of Falun Gong Practitioners in China.” Also appearing before the council were several Chinese victims of rights abuses, including the widow of a man tortured to death in Chinese custody after being abducted for practicing Falun Gong.

“As a Jewish child growing up in the wake of the Holocaust, I made a vow to myself at the very young age of 13, that if it ever happened again, I would do all I could to put a stop to it,” says attorney Terri Marsh. “Now as a human rights lawyer and legal participant in this case, I thank the Sanhedrin for finding the courage and wisdom to expose and condemn the crimes perpetrated by the Chinese Communist Party against members of the Falun Gong faith in China.”

Political Pressure and Olympic Implications

According to the rabbinical body, the Chinese government refused to appear before it, but did submit written and digital materials to refute the complaints. It also reportedly applied political pressure on the court to drop the case, but as a body independent of the Israeli government, the council did not heed the request.

To ensure the fairness of the proceedings without the Chinese government’s formal participation, the court followed a tradition of Jewish jurisprudence and acted “not only as an objective Judge but at the same time as attorney for the side which is absent,” thereby subjecting witnesses to cross-examination.

Having found the Chinese government responsible for the deaths of Falun Gong adherents, the court demanded that the Chinese government “assure the minimum of liberties as indicated by the seven Noahide commandments,” that it implement a Chinese law passed in May 2007 meant to end organ harvesting without consent, and that it allow a coalition of international organizations to enter China and freely investigate the Chinese government’s compliance with the above mentioned commandments, considered to be the “Human Rights Charter according to the Torah.”

Lastly, it stated that “if the human rights issues are not settled before the opening of the Olympics, participation in these Games may be understood to indicate indifference to human rights violations in China, and support for suppression,” rendering such participation “an indirect danger to world peace.”

The full translation from Hebrew of the Sanhedrin’s decision

OLYMPIC WATCH: Human Rights in China and Beijing 2008

Friday, August 01, 2008

Want to break through China’s Olympics censorship?

Falun Gong’s got the roadmap
CFP: By Judi McLeod Friday, August 1, 2008

Beijing OlympicsWith a defiant China standing firm on Internet censorship, one tiny group is standing tall against them. Even as China was hitting back at the United States over human rights criticism yesterday, The Coalition to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong (CIPFG) was writing a detailed guide, a how-to booklet with a map to some of China’s most prominent gulags of despair.

According to CIPFG, not only do these “hellholes” exist—but also some are located within mere miles of Olympic venues.

The booklet, released yesterday shows the 20,000 international journalists expected to cover the Aug.8-24 games, a detailed guide to detention facilities known for their severe abuse of Falun Gong prisoners of conscience.

The guide, entitled Torture Outside the Olympic Village: A Guide to China’s Labor Camps is available online at humanrightstorch.org, or as a 22-page downloadable PDF.

While the Chinese government has sent out a message to the world that certain Internet sites will be blocked, some reporters can arrive at the Olympics equipped with their own roadmap to take them directly to the gulags.

“Many of us have heard stories about China’s gulags, but when you discover how close some of these hellholes are to Olympic venues, it’s sickening,” says Clive Ansley, China Monitor for Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada and North American President of CIPFG.

Reporters now don’t have to take either side of human rights abuses in China, but can see and judge for themselves what life is like for the repressed in the People’s Republic of China.

The guide details seven detention facilities, in or near Beijing, Qingdao, Shanghai, Tianjin, Qinhuangdao and Shenyang.

The CIPFG map is comprehensive and pinpoints not just the exact location of the facility, but the location of the closest Olympic venue, and comes complete with English-language directions to the camp from the nearest airport and train station.

Listed in the booklet is a photo, general description of the facility, details of its prisoner population, overall conditions, and the name, address and phone number (if available).

The brief individual case summaries of current and former prisoners of conscience, the abuse they have suffered in custody, and whether they are available for interviews are included.

During the games Chinese officials will allow access to the online encyclopedia Wikipedia, but most sites with the word `Tibet’ in their domain names are out.

Ditto for the websites of human rights organizations such as Amnesty International, all Falun Gong sites and Reporters Without Borders. Included in the banned list is US radio broadcaster Radio Free Asia.

Reporters Without Borders home page replaced the 5 Olympic rings logo with interlocking handcuffs.

But CIPFG wanted to make a statement that came with the opportunity to break through China’s blackout before the traditional “Let the Games begin” launches the 2008 Olympics.

“We hope this guide will draw international attention to the innocent individuals held at these locations,” says Ansley. “It should particularly aid journalists in investigating the plight of adherents of the Falun Gong, who make up a huge percentage of labor camp detainees and have suffered a brutal campaign of persecution for nine years.”

Falun Gong websites are some of the ones blocked for journalist access by the Chinese government.

“Contrary to promises of “complete freedom” for foreign media, the Chinese authorities have blocked access to Falun Gong-related websites from the Olympic Media

Center in a deal struck with the International Committee,” CIPFG says in its media release.

To circumvent such censorship, CIPFG suggests the following measures:

“Request that colleagues outside China e-mail or fax a copy of the guide to you inside China.

“Use circumvention tools available at internetfreedom.org to access the guide despite the censorship.

“Once you have obtained a copy, please re-post it on other websites, blogs, etc. By creating multiple copies on the Web, the Chinese government’s blocking of the original becomes obsolete.”

The Coalition to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong (CIPFG) was established to unite international human rights organizations, legal experts, medical institutions, NGOs and government representatives around the world to participate in an independent investigation of the Chinese communist regime’s imprisonment, torture, killing and organ harvesting of Falun Gong practitioners. Since August 2007, it has also sponsored the Human Rights Torch Relay, a global grassroots campaign to raise awareness of, and stop, the Chinese communist regime’s human rights crimes against all victimized groups prior to the 2008 Beijing Olympics.

Meanwhile, no one, not even the Chinese Government, can censor the Internet.

Related Articles:

China lifts some web restriction

Torture jails near Olympic venues, group says

OLYMPIC WATCH: Human Rights in China and Beijing 2008

Nine German Olympians protest Chinese politics

BERLIN: IHT - Nine German Olympians have posed with pictures of Chinese dissidents held up in front of their faces to protest the country's politics.

The nine responded to a Suddeutsche Zeitung magazine request sent out to 200 German athletes to pose for a spread headlined "We are all Chinese," which was published Friday.

The headline was a reference to the famous 1963 "Ich bin ein Berliner (I am a Berliner)" line from then American President John F. Kennedy during a speech for freedom after the Berlin Wall was built.

Sabine Spitz, a mountain biker, chose to hold up over her face a picture of Yang Tongyan, a writer sentenced to 12 years for demanding democratic change in China.

"I was excited when I went to the Sydney and Athens Games — I can't say that this time," she said in the caption below the picture. "I don't know what I should think about a country where people can't speak freely."

The athletes posed in their athletic gear as they protested various aspects of Chinese policy, ranging from the one-child rule to lack of freedom of expression.

Many German athletes have shown mixed feelings over the Beijing Games. The country still recalls the 1936 Olympics in Berlin were hosted by the Nazis.

Water polo player Soeren Mackeben was on the cover of the magazine after earlier speaking in favor of the German Olympic team donning orange robes as a tribute to Tibet.

Mackeben wears his swim suit on the cover, which bears the headline: "The naked Truth." His face is covered by Ye Guozhu, reportedly sent to jail for protesting against his restaurant being demolished for the Olympics.

"Ye Guozhu's case is an incomprehensible injustice and irreconcilable with the Olympic spirit," Mackeben said.

Imke Duplitzer, a fencer about to compete in fourth Olympics, chose Gao Zhisheng. Last autumn, he sent a letter to the U.S. Congress, then allegedly disappeared nine days later.

"We're both fighting. Me, as athlete, to win a medal; he as a lawyer for justice," Duplitzer wrote. "Which one is more important?"

OLYMPIC WATCH: Human Rights in China and Beijing 2008